Agencies of Change: Part 2

Case Studies. The business of winning hearts and minds

The event began with David Stevenson of The Rocket Science Group from London, U.K, sharing his insight into various campaigns he or his European peers have worked on to promote social awareness on a variety of topics, focusing especially on teen-drinking and pregnancy (see video below). He advocated an integrated approach, where the message is determined partly by the receiver, where focus-groups are essential to crafting the campaign, where listening is as important as broadcasting and where the broadcasting occurs over strategically selected channels. In the context of this event, Stevenson took on the role of pragmatist, describing in detail the value of research, delivery channels and stressing the importance of PR, not to promote the message exclusively, but to pose questions, talking points, to the target audience.

We were then witness to a highlight reel of recent Ontario government success-stories, including Bensimon-Byrne’s RecycleMe campaign promoting organ donation, GJP’s Foodland Ontario campaign focusing on locally-grown produce, and Partners and Edell’s Mumps awareness campaign, spearheaded by recent inductee into Marketing Hall of Legends, Marlene Hore. Hore, like Stevenson, approached the problem of Mumps awareness from the bottom up, with an endeavor to understand just what it is that college students (the target demographic for this campaign) were concerned about. The campaign resulted in 30,000 vaccinations.

Continue to Part 3

Agencies of Change: Part 3

Ideas. The Changing Role of Communities

Next up was Eli Singer of Entrinsic. His talk tied the successive waves of success of various social media platforms to real-world political events. This represented something of a breath of fresh air, as Singer took a philosophical approach contrary to most of his contemporaries who readily state that it is social media that influences politics, not the reverse. Perhaps most thought-provoking was Singer’s contention that Obama’s political campaign of 2008, that relied heavily of social media, was an example of a “top-down” campaign, where the recent protest of Iran’s presidential election employed the same technology from the “bottom-up”, evidencing (in Twitter parlance) that form often “follows” function.

Then came Tara Hunt, author of “The Whuffie Factor“, who’s talk, entitled “Yes, I DO Mind the Gap” very eloquently proposed that the very separation of marketer and audience ultimately represented a philosophical failing on behalf of those interested in using social media to advocate for social change. She pointed to the disconnect between business values and community values and how this translates into businesses being “community tourists”, attempting to exploit the intrinsic value of internet communities without understanding, respect or deference. Hunt’s argument was that, in order to truly connect with target communities to affect social change, one has to become part of those communities. One has to truly espouse those values that make a community a community. In some respects, Hunt takes Stevenson’s argument for listening to its natural conclusion.

Continue to Part 4

Agencies of Change: Part 4

A Call to Action

Dennis Edell, president and founder of event-sponsor Partners and Edell then shifted gears. Rather than discuss tactics, case-studies, metrics or technologies, Edell instead posed a question to the audience: is not climate change the greatest threat facing humanity today? His talk set the stage for RFK Jr., who subsequently delivered an expertly eloquent, personal, almost off-the-cuff monologue about the “real cost of coal” and a very rational, economic argument for the adoption of clean energy in the United States and beyond.

RFK Jr. represented an encapsulation of Hunt’s argument. The moment he graced the stage, the event shifted in tone. It was no longer about marketing social change, it was about social change. He was bridging the gap that Hunt described. There was little in the way of advertising parlance in RFK Jr.’s talk. Rather, he almost casually rattled off a very sound argument for those nay-sayers who propose that clean energy comes at a cost to the economy. His propositions were fluid, his gravely, affected Kennedy inflection added gravitas to the discussion, his anecdotes ranged from interesting to terrifying to inspiring. Whilst listening to him, one was overcome with a sense that he had great comfort with the material he was presenting. That for him, this talk was something he’d run through at lunch with various congressman friends and that he ultimately believed, that just around the corner, was a better world. A cleaner world. A richer world for all of us…

If we were to “just do it”.


Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ';', expecting T_STRING or T_VARIABLE or '$' in /home/sochange/public_html/wp-content/themes/lsc2012/footer.php on line 23